The fixed overhead variances look at whether amounts spent by the business on fixed overheads (such as factory rent) were more or less than expected.
For the purposes of this article let’s use the following figures:
|Fixed overhead (factory rent)||100,000||120,000|
Fixed overhead variances under marginal costing
If the company is using marginal costing there will only be one fixed overhead variance; the fixed overhead expenditure variance which is simply the difference between the budgeted and actual fixed overhead figures. It can be calculated as:
|Budgeted fixed overhead||£100,000|
|Actual fixed overhead||£120,000|
|Fixed overhead expenditure variance||£20,000 (A)|
This variance is adverse as the amount actually spent on fixed overheads was greater than expected which will reduce the profit made by the business. Perhaps this was caused by our landlord increasing our rent unexpectedly for example.
The Fixed overhead variances under absorption costing
- If the company is using absorption costing then the fixed overhead variance can be subdivided to give more information about what changed compared to the original budget.
Fixed overhead expenditure variance – This is the budgeted fixed overhead compared to the actual fixed overhead and is calculated in the same way as for marginal costing above. This variance would still be £20,000 (A).
Fixed overhead volume variance – This looks at how much output we got from the factory that we are renting and takes the difference between the budgeted and actual production volume figures and values this at the standard fixed overhead absorption rate (FOAR). Remember that this standard FOAR will be based on the budgeted figures, in this case £100,000/50,000units = £2 per unit.
|Budgeted production volume||50,000 units|
|Actual production volume||55,000 units|
|Variance (in units)||5,000 (F)|
|Valued at the standard FOAR per unit||£2|
|Variance (£)||£10,000 (F)|
In this case the variance is favourable as we managed to produce more units than budgeted so we got more out of the factory that we are renting which should improve profits.
Explaining the fixed overhead volume variance
The fixed overhead volume variance can then be further broken down to look at the reasons why the actual volume of production achieved was different from the budgeted volume. In our example we managed to produce 5,000 units more than we budgeted (which was why the volume variance was favourable). This extra volume could have been caused by two factors; staff might have worked more quickly than expected, or staff might have worked more hours than expected.
- Fixed overhead efficiency variance – This looks at how quickly the workforce made units of production by comparing the time that actual production should have taken to the time it actually took. Faster staff will lead to a greater volume of production. One thing we need to identify is how fast we expected staff to work, or the standard hours per unit, which is 200,000 hours/50,000 units = 4 hours per unit from the budget.
- The calculation can then be done as follows:
|Actual production (units)|
|should take (at standard hours per unit)55,000 x 4 hours per unit||220,000 hours|
|– did take||215,000 hours|
|Variance in hours||5,000 (F)|
|Valued at the standard FOAR per hour||£0.50|
|Variance (£)||£2,500 (F)|
Notice that because the variance is initially measured in hours we need to value it at a standard FOAR per hour which is £100,000/200,000 = £0.50 per hour.
This variance is favourable as staff were faster than the expected 4 hours per unit which means they would produce a higher volume of output in a given period of time.
Fixed overhead capacity variance – This looks at the number of hours staff worked compared to budget. More hours worked will lead to a greater capacity to produce units.
|Budgeted hours worked||200,000 hours|
|Actual hours worked||215,000 hours|
|Variance (in hours)||15,000 (F)|
|Valued at the fixed OAR per hour||£0.50|
|Variance (£)||£7,500 (F)|
This variance is favourable as staff worked 15,000 hours more than budgeted in which time they could have produced a higher volume of output than expected.
You can check that your efficiency and capacity figures make sense as they should add back to the volume variance; £2,500 (F) + £7,500 (F) = £10,000 (F). This shows that staff worked faster than expected and also worked more hours than expected, both of which led to the extra 5,000 units of volume.
Here’s a chance for you to practice the calculations:
Budgeted fixed overheads are £50,000. Budgeted output is 10,000 units taking 20,000 labour hours. Actual output is 8,000 units which took 17,000 labour hours. Actual fixed overheads were £52,000.
What are the fixed overhead expenditure, volume, efficiency and capacity variances?
Once you have finished you can watch me go through my answers here:
We also have a blog on direct variances here.